Bengaluru: The political and constitutional confrontation over MNREGA versus the VB-G RAM G Act has escalated sharply in Karnataka, turning into a direct face-off between the Governor and the State Government, casting uncertainty over the proposed special joint session of the Legislature.
The crisis erupted after Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot refused to deliver the government-drafted address for the special joint session, objecting to portions of the speech that strongly criticised the Union Government’s decision to rename the MNREGA scheme.
The Congress-led Siddaramaiah government, which had planned the special session as a constitutional protest against the Centre’s move, now finds itself locked in a high-stakes institutional conflict that may reach the Supreme Court.
Governor Objects, Government Stands Firm
According to official sources, the Governor conveyed to Chief Secretary Shalini Rajneesh that several paragraphs in the speech — reportedly 11 key sections — needed to be removed, stating that the address was entirely confrontational towards the Centre. He made it clear that unless the content was altered, he would not read the speech.
This triggered intense political activity throughout the day, with a ministerial delegation rushing to Raj Bhavan (Lok Bhavan) in an attempt to persuade the Governor.
The delegation included Assembly Speaker U.T. Khader, Legislative Council Chairman Basavaraj Horatti, Law Minister H.K. Patil, CM’s Legal Advisor A.S. Ponnanna, Advocate General Shashikiran Shetty. Despite prolonged discussions, the Governor refused to budge, insisting on substantive deletions.
Siddaramaiah Draws the Line
Following the failed talks, Law Minister H.K. Patil briefed Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, after which another high-level meeting was held at the CM’s residence late in the evening.
While the Chief Minister reportedly agreed to minor wording changes, he categorically rejected any dilution of the government’s political stand, reiterating that the address reflects the Cabinet’s collective decision to defend the rights of workers, the poor, and the State’s financial interests.
Legal Advisor A.S. Ponnanna later conveyed the government’s final position to the Governor: The joint session address is not the Governor’s personal speech but a constitutional articulation of the elected government’s policies and stance.
Legal Battle Inevitable
With the standoff unresolved, the crisis has taken a legal turn.
Following a CM-led strategy meeting, Advocate General Shashikiran Shetty flew to New Delhi, tasked with preparing a possible petition before the Supreme Court Chief Justice if the Governor refuses to attend or address the joint session.
The State Government is considering seeking judicial directions on:
- The Governor’s constitutional obligation to deliver the Cabinet-approved address
- Preventing a breakdown of legislative proceedings
Interestingly, sources indicate that the Governor has also sought legal opinion, signalling a full-blown constitutional confrontation.
Joint Session Under Cloud
As matters stand, a shadow of uncertainty looms over the special joint session, originally convened to politically and constitutionally challenge the VB-G RAM G Act (renamed MNREGA).
With both sides preparing for a legal showdown, Karnataka appears headed towards one of its most serious Centre–State constitutional crises in recent years.
ಇದನ್ನೂ ಓದಿ: ಮನ್ರೇಗಾ ವಿವಾದ: ರಾಜ್ಯಪಾಲರ ಭಾಷಣ ನಿರಾಕರಣೆಯಿಂದ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕದಲ್ಲಿ ಸಂವಿಧಾನಾತ್ಮಕ ಬಿಕ್ಕಟ್ಟು
About the Author
